Suse 9.1 Personal. and rpm/apt

the main gist of this is can suse 9. 1 personal support apt and synaptic prefaberly while yast is good i miss synaptic and apt. I just installed suse about 20 minutes ago so im still exploring, but of course i have a few more questions does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels The reason im looking for synapti ...

Everything Linux 1798 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp

309 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-02-24
the main gist of this is can suse 9.1 personal support apt and synaptic prefaberly while yast is good i miss synaptic and apt. I just installed suse about 20 minutes ago so im still exploring,
 
but of course i have a few more questions
does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels
 
The reason im looking for synaptic is gnome. i really dislike kde and mostly use xfce or gnome or fluxbox and i wanted to get gnome on here prefably 2.6 or 2.8
 
also how hard is it to compile gnome from scratch through the command line??
 
but of course i have a few more questions
does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels
 
 
thanks in advance

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

305 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-08-30
as far as building gnome from tarballs it's a pain in the arse and it may kill you. The best part is when you think you are all done and it's all broke and acting funky. Here is a great project called garnome it's scripts that build gnome from tarballs for you, it's brilliant.
http://cipherfunk.org/garnome/
 
here is the gnome build dependencies list.
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.8/notes/rninstallation.html
 
alot of makes and ./configures
 

data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp

309 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-02-24
OP
i got an issue with signing with the packages and am unsure of how to fixt this
 
this is what i get when i type
sudo apt-get install synaptic
 
Checking GPG signatures...
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/xmlcharent_0.3-250.4_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/docbook%5f4_4.3-0.1_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/synaptic_0.55-0.0.suse091.rb.0_i586.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#8c9b4b0d)
E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
2 unsigned package(s)
1 package(s) with unknown signatures
0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures
 
i did gpg but am unsure if i did it right any help would be appreciated

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

1678 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-09-27
Hi soulNOTHING, Im running into this problem right now. With RH/Fedora you could turn this off, there is a risk but I did it a long time with RH/Fedora and had no problems. Did you ever get this solved? I'm trying to install bittorrent-gui...
 

Code:
dapper@dan:~ # apt-get -f install bittorrent-guiReading Package Lists... DoneBuilding Dependency Tree... DoneThe following extra packages will be installed:  bittorrent python-wxGTK wxGTK-glThe following NEW packages will be installed:  bittorrent bittorrent-gui python-wxGTK wxGTK-gl0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 removed and 292 not upgraded.Need to get 0B/3430kB of archives.After unpacking 16.6MB of additional disk space will be used.Do you want to continue? [Y/n] yChecking GPG signatures...Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/bittorrent_3.4.1-2_noarch.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#bfbf94b3)Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/bittorrent-gui_3.4.1-2_noarch.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#bfbf94b3)E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:0 unsigned package(s)2 package(s) with unknown signatures0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signaturesdapper@dan:~ #
 
:x