Suse 9.1 Personal. and rpm/apt
the main gist of this is can suse 9. 1 personal support apt and synaptic prefaberly while yast is good i miss synaptic and apt. I just installed suse about 20 minutes ago so im still exploring, but of course i have a few more questions does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels The reason im looking for synapti ...
the main gist of this is can suse 9.1 personal support apt and synaptic prefaberly while yast is good i miss synaptic and apt. I just installed suse about 20 minutes ago so im still exploring,
but of course i have a few more questions
does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels
The reason im looking for synaptic is gnome. i really dislike kde and mostly use xfce or gnome or fluxbox and i wanted to get gnome on here prefably 2.6 or 2.8
also how hard is it to compile gnome from scratch through the command line??
but of course i have a few more questions
does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels
thanks in advance
but of course i have a few more questions
does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels
The reason im looking for synaptic is gnome. i really dislike kde and mostly use xfce or gnome or fluxbox and i wanted to get gnome on here prefably 2.6 or 2.8
also how hard is it to compile gnome from scratch through the command line??
but of course i have a few more questions
does suse have prebuilt i686 optimized kernels
thanks in advance
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
as far as building gnome from tarballs it's a pain in the arse and it may kill you. The best part is when you think you are all done and it's all broke and acting funky. Here is a great project called garnome it's scripts that build gnome from tarballs for you, it's brilliant.
http://cipherfunk.org/garnome/
here is the gnome build dependencies list.
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.8/notes/rninstallation.html
alot of makes and ./configures
http://cipherfunk.org/garnome/
here is the gnome build dependencies list.
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.8/notes/rninstallation.html
alot of makes and ./configures
i didnt have much time to search earlier working on two papers anyhow found this site seems pretty good
http://linux01.gwdg.de/apt4rpm/
and im going to try that script
http://linux01.gwdg.de/apt4rpm/
and im going to try that script
i got an issue with signing with the packages and am unsure of how to fixt this
this is what i get when i type
sudo apt-get install synaptic
Checking GPG signatures...
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/xmlcharent_0.3-250.4_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/docbook%5f4_4.3-0.1_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/synaptic_0.55-0.0.suse091.rb.0_i586.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#8c9b4b0d)
E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
2 unsigned package(s)
1 package(s) with unknown signatures
0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures
i did gpg but am unsure if i did it right any help would be appreciated
this is what i get when i type
sudo apt-get install synaptic
Checking GPG signatures...
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/xmlcharent_0.3-250.4_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/docbook%5f4_4.3-0.1_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/synaptic_0.55-0.0.suse091.rb.0_i586.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#8c9b4b0d)
E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
2 unsigned package(s)
1 package(s) with unknown signatures
0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures
i did gpg but am unsure if i did it right any help would be appreciated
Hi soulNOTHING, Im running into this problem right now. With RH/Fedora you could turn this off, there is a risk but I did it a long time with RH/Fedora and had no problems. Did you ever get this solved? I'm trying to install bittorrent-gui...
Code:
:x
Code:
dapper@dan:~ # apt-get -f install bittorrent-guiReading Package Lists... DoneBuilding Dependency Tree... DoneThe following extra packages will be installed: bittorrent python-wxGTK wxGTK-glThe following NEW packages will be installed: bittorrent bittorrent-gui python-wxGTK wxGTK-gl0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 removed and 292 not upgraded.Need to get 0B/3430kB of archives.After unpacking 16.6MB of additional disk space will be used.Do you want to continue? [Y/n] yChecking GPG signatures...Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/bittorrent_3.4.1-2_noarch.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#bfbf94b3)Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/bittorrent-gui_3.4.1-2_noarch.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#bfbf94b3)E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:0 unsigned package(s)2 package(s) with unknown signatures0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signaturesdapper@dan:~ #
:x
Hi,
looking for some of my own answers when i read this post. I was able to get apt, and synaptic to work in SuSE 9.1.
I installed apt via YaST from an RPM i grabbed off (unfortunately you will have to resolve all the dependencies manually this one last time...)I had no luck with apt-get'ing synaptic, even when ignoring the GPG signiture check <apt-get -o GPG::Check=false install synaptic> package installed, but was broken.
Uninstalled RPM, then I downloaded and compiled the source, and using the errors from the MULTIPLE ./configure attempts filled in the missing peices.
Hope this helps, and isn't the MOST retarded way to do this. I am learning as I go
Oh. My issue: anybody know how to tell synaptic to ignore missing signitures like you can with apt-get?
looking for some of my own answers when i read this post. I was able to get apt, and synaptic to work in SuSE 9.1.
I installed apt via YaST from an RPM i grabbed off (unfortunately you will have to resolve all the dependencies manually this one last time...)I had no luck with apt-get'ing synaptic, even when ignoring the GPG signiture check <apt-get -o GPG::Check=false install synaptic> package installed, but was broken.
Uninstalled RPM, then I downloaded and compiled the source, and using the errors from the MULTIPLE ./configure attempts filled in the missing peices.
Hope this helps, and isn't the MOST retarded way to do this. I am learning as I go
Oh. My issue: anybody know how to tell synaptic to ignore missing signitures like you can with apt-get?